Jump To Navigation

Publications

The U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission

Questions and Answers:
Enforcement Guidance on Disability-Related Inquiries and Medical Examinations of Employees Under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA)

INTRODUCTION

What does this Guidance address?

  • The Guidance explains the ADA's rules concerning when employers may and may not obtain medical information about their employees.

Why did the EEOC issue this Guidance?

  • In October 1995, the EEOC issued enforcement guidance explaining the ADA's rules concerning when an employer may and may not make disability-related inquiries and require medical examinations of applicants. Since that time, we have had many inquiries from EEOC investigators and attorneys in the field, employers, and employees about how the law applies with respect to people who are already working. This Guidance is intended to answer some of the most frequently-asked questions we have received.

To whom does the Guidance apply?

  • The Guidance applies to private and to state and local government employers with fifteen or more employees. Federal sector employers are also covered by the Guidance, as the result of the 1992 amendments to the Rehabilitation Act.
  • The ADA's requirements regarding disability-related inquiries and medical examinations apply to all of the employees of a covered employer, whether or not they have disabilities.

IN GENERAL

Are the rules about when an employer may make disability-related inquiries and require medical examinations the same for employees and applicants? (Introduction) (For more information about this and other issues discussed in these Questions and Answers, please consult the referenced question numbers from the Guidance.)

  • No. The ADA limits an employer's ability to make disability-related inquiries or require medical examinations at three stages: pre-offer, post-offer, and during employment. The rules concerning disability-related inquiries and medical examinations are different at each stage.
    • At the first stage (prior to an offer of employment), an employer may not ask any disability-related questions or require any medical examinations, even if they are related to the job.
    • At the second stage (after an applicant is given a conditional job offer, but before he or she starts work), an employer may ask disability-related questions and conduct medical examinations, regardless of whether they are related to the job, as long as it does so for all entering employees in the same job category.
    • At the third stage (after employment begins), an employer may make disability-related inquiries and require medical examinations only if they are job-related and consistent with business necessity.

What is a "disability-related inquiry"? (Question 1)

  • A "disability-related inquiry" is a question that is likely to elicit information about a disability, such as asking employees about: whether they have or ever had a disability; the kinds of prescription medications they are taking; and, the results of any genetic tests they have had.
  • Disability-related inquires also include asking an employee's co-worker, family member, or doctor about the employee's disability.
  • Questions that are not likely to elicit information about a disability are always permitted, and they include asking employees about their general well-being; whether they can perform job functions; and about their current illegal use of drugs.

What is a "medical examination"? (Question 2)

  • A "medical examination" is a procedure or test usually given by a health care professional or in a medical setting that seeks information about an individual's physical or mental impairments or health. Medical examinations include vision tests; blood, urine, and breath analyses; blood pressure screening and cholesterol testing; and diagnostic procedures, such as x-rays, CAT scans, and MRIs.

Are there any procedures or tests employers may require that would not be considered medical examinations? (Question 2)

  • Yes. There are a number of procedures and tests that employers may require that are not considered medical examinations, including: blood and urine tests to determine the current illegal use of drugs; physical agility and physical fitness tests; and polygraph examinations.

JOB RELATED AND CONSISTENT WITH BUSINESS NECESSITY

When may an employer ask an employee a disability-related question or require an employee to submit to a medical examination? (Question 5)

  • Generally, an employer only may seek information about an employee's medical condition when it is job related and consistent with business necessity. This means that the employer must have a reasonable belief based on objective evidence that:
    • an employee will be unable to perform the essential functions his or her job because of a medical condition; or,
    • the employee will pose a direct threat because of a medical condition.
  • Employers also may obtain medical information about an employee when the employee has requested a reasonable accommodation and his or her disability or need for accommodation is not obvious.
  • In addition, employers can obtain medical information about employees when they:
    • are required to do so by another federal law or regulation (e.g., DOT medical certification requirements for interstate truck drivers); (Question 21)
    • offer voluntary programs aimed at identifying and treating common health problems, such as high blood pressure and cholesterol; (Question 22)
    • are undertaking affirmative action because of a federal, state, or local law that requires affirmative action for individuals with disabilities or voluntarily using the information they obtain to benefit individuals with disabilities. (Question 23)

What should an employer do if it learns about an employee's medical condition from someone else? (Question 6)

  • First, the employer should determine whether the information learned is reliable. The employer should consider how well the person providing the information knows the individual, the seriousness of the medical condition, and how the person learned the information.
  • The employer should then determine whether the information gives rise to a reasonable belief that the employee in question will be unable to perform the essential functions of his or her job because of the medical condition or will pose a direct threat because of the condition.
  • If the information does give rise to such a reasonable belief, then the employer may make disability-related inquiries or require a medical examination as permitted by the Guidance.

May an employer ask all employees what prescription medications they are taking? (Question 8)

  • Generally, no. In limited circumstances, however, employers may be able to ask employees in positions affecting public safety about their use of medications that may affect their ability to perform essential functions and thereby result in a direct threat.
  • For example, an airline could require pilots to report when they are taking medications that may affect their ability to fly. A fire department, however, could not require employees in administrative positions to report their use of medication because it is unlikely that these employees would pose a direct threat as a result of an inability, or impaired ability, to do their jobs.

What may an employer do if it believes that an employee is having performance problems because of a medical condition, but the employee won't answer any questions or go to the doctor? (Question 9)

  • The employer may discipline the employee for his or her performance problems just as it would any other employee having similar performance problems.

SCOPE AND MANNER OF INQUIRIES AND EXAMINATIONS

May an employer have an employee who is requesting a reasonable accommodation examined by its own health care provider? (Question 11)

  • In some instances, yes. If the employer has explained what type of documentation is needed, and the employee fails to provide it or provides insufficient documentation, the employer may require the employee to see a health care professional of the employer's choice.
  • Even where an employee initially provides insufficient documentation, however, the employer should consider asking the employee's health care provider for additional information before requiring an examination by the employer's health care professional. This is because an employee's health care provider frequently is in the best position to provide information about the employee's limitations.

May an employer have an employee who it reasonably believes will pose a direct threat examined by its own health care provider? (Question 12)

  • Yes. This is because the employer is responsible for assessing whether an employee poses a direct threat based on a reasonable medical judgment that relies on the most current medical knowledge and/or best objective evidence.
  • The health care professional the employer chooses should have expertise in the employee's specific medical condition and be able to provide medical information that allows the employer to determine the effects of the condition on the employee's ability to perform his or her job.
  • If the employer's health care professional believes that the employee poses a direct threat, but the employee's own doctor disagrees, the employer should evaluate the conflicting medical information by considering, for example, the area of expertise of each medical professional; the kind of information each provided; and, whether the information provided is consistent with the employer's own observations of or knowledge about the employee.

DISABILITY-RELATED INQUIRIES AND MEDICAL EXAMINATIONS RELATED TO LEAVE

May an employer request that an employee provide a doctor's note or other explanation when the employee has used sick leave? (Question 15)

  • Yes. An employer is entitled to know why an employee is requesting sick leave. An employer, therefore, may ask an employee to provide a doctor's note or other explanation, as long as it has a policy or practice of requiring all employees to do so.

May an employer ask disability-related questions or require a medical examination when an employee who has been on leave for a medical condition wants to return to work? (Question 17)

  • Yes, if an employer has a reasonable belief that an employee's present ability to perform essential functions will be impaired by a medical condition or that he or she will pose a direct threat because of a medical condition.
  • Any inquiries or examination, however, must be limited in scope to what is needed to determine whether the employee is able to work.

PERIODIC MEDICAL EXAMINATIONS AND TESTING

May employers require employees to have periodic medical examinations? (Question 18)

  • No, with very limited exceptions for employees who work in positions affecting public safety, such as police officers, firefighters, or airline pilots. Even in these limited situations, the examinations must address specific job-related concerns. For example, a police department could periodically conduct vision tests or electrocardiograms because of concerns about conditions that could affect the ability to perform essential job functions and thereby result in a direct threat. A police department could not, however, periodically test its officers to determine whether they are HIV-positive, because a diagnosis of this condition alone would not result in a direct threat.

May employers subject employees to periodic alcohol testing? (Question 19)

  • Generally, no. Employers, however, may subject employees who have been in alcohol rehabilitation programs to periodic alcohol testing where the employer has a reasonable belief that the employee will pose a direct threat in absence of such testing.
  • In determining whether to subject such an employee to periodic alcohol testing, the employer should consider the safety risks associated with the position the employee holds, the consequences of the employee's inability or impaired ability to do his or her job, and the reason(s) why the employer believes that the employee will pose a direct threat.
  • Of course, an employer may maintain and enforce rules prohibiting employees from being under the influence of alcohol in the workplace and may conduct alcohol testing for this purpose if it has a reasonable belief that an employee has been drinking during work hours.

This page was last modified on July 27, 2000.

Problems Prevented and Solved

Successful representation of design professional in historic building damage claim - read more

Representation of manufacturing entity in asset-based lending transaction - read more

Successful resolution of claim by business buyer against business seller - read more

Defense verdict in favor of lift manufacturer - read more

$37 million verdict in contractor/municipality dispute - read more

Successful defense of unfair competition action - read more

Acquisition of industrial property requiring environmental remediation - read more

Negotiation of a multi-million dollar statewide strategic sourcing contract - read more

Examples of "preventive law" advice provided to clients - read more

Successful resolution of claim against architectural firm involving design of concert hall - read more

Representation of numerous companies in structuring reductions in force - read more

Successful resolution of gender and race discrimination claim - read more

Successful settlement of action against architect in multi-phase condominium project - read more

Negotiation and finalization of software transfer transaction - read more

Successful settlement of architectural malpractice claim in roof collapse case - read more

Creation of ESOP as part of founder's succession plan - read more

Representation of retail distributor in acquisition of store locations - read more

Successful enforcement of covenant not to compete - read more

Six-figure settlement for manufacturing firm against consultants - read more

Representation of company in the negotiation and drafting of executive employment agreements - read more

Successful resolution of quadriplegia personal injury claim against college - read more

Successful defense of computer hardware manufacturer - read more

Successful resolution of multi-million dollar hotel water intrusion/mold growth claim - read more

Successful defense in architectural malpractice claim involving medical facility - read more

Successful resolution of a deficient design claim for a designer and construction manager of a warehouse distribution facility - read more

Updating estate planning documents reveals major flaws - read more

Defense verdict for accounting firm in "deepening insolvency" case - read more

Successful resolution of shareholder buy/sell claim - read more

Successful resolution of sexual harassment claim - read more

Defense verdict in whistleblower/wrongful termination claim - read more

Acquisition, financing and development of manufacturing facility - read more

Successful settlement in favor of architect on highway design claim - read more

Successful defense of employee's pregnancy discrimination and family leave act claims - read more

Creative estate tax planning for the owner of a Subchapter S Corporation - read more

Successful defense of electrical product manufacturer - read more

Successful negotiation with the IRS to eliminate mounting interest and penalties for estate heirs - read more

Contact Us

475 Allendale Road, Suite 200
King of Prussia, PA 19406
Phone: 610-354-9700
Fax: 610-354-9760
Directions to King of Prussia Office
email us

1814 East Route 70, Suite 350
Cherry Hill, NJ 08003
Phone:856-663-0021
Fax: 856-663-1590
Directions to Cherry Hill Office
email us

114 North Second Street
5th Floor
Harrisburg, PA 17101
Phone: 717-238-9300
Fax: 717-238-9325
Directions to Harrisburg Office
email us

651 Holiday Drive
Foster Plaza 5, Suite 300
Pittsburgh, PA 15220
Phone: 412-250-2632
Fax: 412-250-4804
Directions to Pittsburgh Office
email us