Jump To Navigation

Philadelphia Enacts A "Ban The Box" Ordinance

Philadelphia has joined a growing list of jurisdictions across the country that have enacted "ban the box" legislation that prohibits employers from making inquiries into an applicant's arrest or criminal conviction record at the early stages of the hiring process. (The "box" refers to the section of many employment applications that asks for arrest and conviction information.) The primary rationale of the "ban the box" movement is to increase employment opportunities (and, hopefully, to reduce recidivism) among qualified individuals with criminal records, and to combat the stereotypes that often accompany those who have been convicted of a crime.

"Ban the box" laws have been well-publicized of late, but most employers do not realize that even if they do business in a municipality without a "ban the box" law, the use of arrest and conviction records in hiring decisions can lead to serious liabilities.

Here's what you need to know.

Philadelphia's "ban the box" law goes into effect in July 2011 and applies to Philadelphia employers with ten or more employees (the law excepts certain kinds of businesses required to do background checks). Under the new ordinance, Philadelphia employers are barred from doing two things.

First, Philadelphia employers may not make any inquiries or take any adverse action against an employee or applicant based on a criminal accusation which is not then pending and did not result in a conviction.

Second, Philadelphia employers may not make any inquiry regarding or require any applicant to disclose any criminal convictions during the application process until after the employer has conducted a first interview.

In other words, Philadelphia employers may never ask about prior accusations that did not lead to a conviction, and they may not ask about convictions until after the initial screening (whether in-person or over the phone) is completed - a prohibition designed to preclude the common practice of excluding any applicant with a conviction from even applying for a job.

Thereafter, Philadelphia employers, like all other employers, can perform background checks and ask about criminal convictions, but that is the point at which other, lesser-known laws kick in - even apart from "ban the box" laws, employers do not have the unfettered right to use criminal background information, and many employers are paying the price for stepping over the line.

For example, Pennsylvania, like many other states, has enacted legislation that prohibits Pennsylvania employers from using criminal background information in hiring decisions unless the information directly relates to the applicant's suitability for the position (for example, a history of DUI convictions could be used when considering an applicant for a truck driver position). And if a Pennsylvania employer does use the criminal background information in the hiring decision, it must disclose that fact to the applicant (for the obvious purpose of allowing the applicant to challenge the employer's actions).

Federal legislation, like the Fair Credit Reporting Act, can also come into play. And, very significantly, the EEOC has stressed, especially in the last year, that wholesale disqualification of applicants with criminal records could lead to discrimination lawsuits because of the adverse impact this sort of decision-making process can have on certain minorities.

Here's the take away:

  • If you are a Philadelphia employer, you'll need to take a close look at your application forms and procedures, and you'll need to make sure all personnel involved in the hiring process are aware of and know how to comply with the "ban the box" law;
  • No matter where you do business, you'll need to determine whether your hiring practices conform with the laws regarding the collection and use of criminal background information. Reformulating policies and procedures, and proper training of employees involved in the hiring process, will be crucial.

Let us know if we can help.

Problems Prevented and Solved

Representation of manufacturing entity in asset-based lending transaction - read more

Acquisition, financing and development of manufacturing facility - read more

Successful resolution of sexual harassment claim - read more

Examples of "preventive law" advice provided to clients - read more

Successful resolution of a deficient design claim for a designer and construction manager of a warehouse distribution facility - read more

Successful defense of unfair competition action - read more

Negotiation of a multi-million dollar statewide strategic sourcing contract - read more

Creation of ESOP as part of founder's succession plan - read more

Creative estate tax planning for the owner of a Subchapter S Corporation - read more

Successful negotiation with the IRS to eliminate mounting interest and penalties for estate heirs - read more

Successful defense of computer hardware manufacturer - read more

Successful settlement of action against architect in multi-phase condominium project - read more

Successful resolution of multi-million dollar hotel water intrusion/mold growth claim - read more

Successful defense of electrical product manufacturer - read more

Representation of numerous companies in structuring reductions in force - read more

Defense verdict in whistleblower/wrongful termination claim - read more

Successful resolution of claim against architectural firm involving design of concert hall - read more

Successful defense of employee's pregnancy discrimination and family leave act claims - read more

Updating estate planning documents reveals major flaws - read more

$37 million verdict in contractor/municipality dispute - read more

Successful resolution of claim by business buyer against business seller - read more

Representation of retail distributor in acquisition of store locations - read more

Successful resolution of quadriplegia personal injury claim against college - read more

Defense verdict in favor of lift manufacturer - read more

Successful settlement of architectural malpractice claim in roof collapse case - read more

Six-figure settlement for manufacturing firm against consultants - read more

Successful enforcement of covenant not to compete - read more

Defense verdict for accounting firm in "deepening insolvency" case - read more

Negotiation and finalization of software transfer transaction - read more

Successful settlement in favor of architect on highway design claim - read more

Successful resolution of shareholder buy/sell claim - read more

Successful representation of design professional in historic building damage claim - read more

Successful resolution of gender and race discrimination claim - read more

Acquisition of industrial property requiring environmental remediation - read more

Successful defense in architectural malpractice claim involving medical facility - read more

Representation of company in the negotiation and drafting of executive employment agreements - read more

Contact Us

475 Allendale Road, Suite 200
King of Prussia, PA 19406
Phone: 610-354-9700
Fax: 610-354-9760
Directions to King of Prussia Office
email us

1814 East Route 70, Suite 350
Cherry Hill, NJ 08003
Phone:856-663-0021
Fax: 856-663-1590
Directions to Cherry Hill Office
email us

114 North Second Street
5th Floor
Harrisburg, PA 17101
Phone: 717-238-9300
Fax: 717-238-9325
Directions to Harrisburg Office
email us

651 Holiday Drive
Foster Plaza 5, Suite 300
Pittsburgh, PA 15220
Phone: 412-250-2632
Fax: 412-250-4804
Directions to Pittsburgh Office
email us