Jump To Navigation

A New, and Dangerous, Americans With Disabilities Act

On June 24, 2011, a striking new battery of EEOC regulations became effective, dramatically changing the employment law fundamentals of the Americans with Disabilities Act. In the process, much of what was the right way to handle ADA issues since 1990 was transformed into the wrong way to handle ADA issues from that date forward.

What normally follows legal changes of this magnitude is a torrent of lawsuits filed by well-advised employees against ill-advised employers. Here is what you need to know to begin the process of managing these risks.

Since its enactment, the ADA has mandated that an employer must provide a "reasonable accommodation" to a qualified employee who has a "disability" so that the employee would thereby be enabled to do his/her job. The working definition of "disability" has always been (with key words bolded) "a physical or mental impairment that substantially limits a major life activity." Literally by definition, not every impairment was a "disability" that would trigger ADA responsibilities - only those conditions that a) substantially limited b) a major life activity mattered. Less than substantial limitations, or substantial limitations on less than major life activities, would not be legally significant.

Until now. In two very important ways, the new EEOC regulations have changed all that.

First, one would think that the phrase "substantially limits," as in "substantially limits a major life activity," means what it says. Limits a considerable amount. Or limits a lot. Or limits to a significant extent. But, as of June 24, here's what the EEOC now says "substantially limits" means: "An impairment does not need to prevent or severely or significantly restrict a major life activity to be considered 'substantially limiting.'"

Really? An impairment can "substantially limit" a major life activity even if it does not significantly restrict that major life activity?

Second, one would also think that an impairment of a "major life activity" would, well, mean an impairment of a major life activity. Not anymore. As of June 24 the definition of an impairment of a major life activity includes an impairment of a person's major bodily functions - immune system, digestive system, reproductive system, endocrine system, musculoskeletal system, and so on -- even if, says the EEOC, the impairment to those functions does not affect the person's life in a significant way.

Seriously? A life activity can be "major" even if that life activity is insignificant?

Bottom line: the words of the ADA no longer mean what they say. As of June 24, almost anything will be a "disability" covered by the ADA, which will lead to an influx of ADA-based disability claims from employees who do not seem to be impaired in any significant way. You'll need to make sure your company is geared up to respond properly. Depending on common sense alone can result in substantial liabilities.

The take-away from all this is that employers who, understandably, assume that employees who run marathons and bench press 400 pounds cannot be "disabled" will pay a steep price. Get counsel to help you make the difficult calls, but your company mindset needs to focus much less on whether an employee is disabled (because almost any condition will be a "disability" after June 24) and much more on understanding and implementing the interactive dialogue and reasonable accommodation requirements of the ADA. If your executives, managers and supervisors are not conversant with those requirements, get the proper advice as soon as feasible.

Implementing this approach is a two-step process.

First, the new ADA effectively mandates that you make major revisions to ADA policies, procedures and forms, both in respect to employee handbooks and in the instructions provided to executives, managers and supervisors confronted with potential ADA issues.

Second, words on paper will not be enough: executive, managerial and supervisory personnel must be trained to properly react to this new, confusing and counter-intuitive reality.

Let us know if we can help.

Problems Prevented and Solved

Representation of manufacturing entity in asset-based lending transaction - read more

Updating estate planning documents reveals major flaws - read more

Creation of ESOP as part of founder's succession plan - read more

Negotiation and finalization of software transfer transaction - read more

Defense verdict in whistleblower/wrongful termination claim - read more

Successful negotiation with the IRS to eliminate mounting interest and penalties for estate heirs - read more

Representation of company in the negotiation and drafting of executive employment agreements - read more

Successful resolution of claim against architectural firm involving design of concert hall - read more

Successful representation of design professional in historic building damage claim - read more

Successful defense of electrical product manufacturer - read more

Examples of "preventive law" advice provided to clients - read more

Negotiation of a multi-million dollar statewide strategic sourcing contract - read more

Successful settlement of architectural malpractice claim in roof collapse case - read more

Successful resolution of quadriplegia personal injury claim against college - read more

Acquisition, financing and development of manufacturing facility - read more

Defense verdict for accounting firm in "deepening insolvency" case - read more

Successful resolution of a deficient design claim for a designer and construction manager of a warehouse distribution facility - read more

Successful enforcement of covenant not to compete - read more

Defense verdict in favor of lift manufacturer - read more

Successful defense of unfair competition action - read more

Acquisition of industrial property requiring environmental remediation - read more

Successful defense of employee's pregnancy discrimination and family leave act claims - read more

Representation of retail distributor in acquisition of store locations - read more

Successful resolution of multi-million dollar hotel water intrusion/mold growth claim - read more

Creative estate tax planning for the owner of a Subchapter S Corporation - read more

Successful defense in architectural malpractice claim involving medical facility - read more

Successful settlement of action against architect in multi-phase condominium project - read more

Successful resolution of gender and race discrimination claim - read more

Successful settlement in favor of architect on highway design claim - read more

$37 million verdict in contractor/municipality dispute - read more

Representation of numerous companies in structuring reductions in force - read more

Successful resolution of shareholder buy/sell claim - read more

Successful resolution of sexual harassment claim - read more

Successful defense of computer hardware manufacturer - read more

Successful resolution of claim by business buyer against business seller - read more

Six-figure settlement for manufacturing firm against consultants - read more

Contact Us

475 Allendale Road, Suite 200
King of Prussia, PA 19406
Phone: 610-354-9700
Fax: 610-354-9760
Directions to King of Prussia Office
email us

1814 East Route 70, Suite 350
Cherry Hill, NJ 08003
Phone:856-663-0021
Fax: 856-663-1590
Directions to Cherry Hill Office
email us

114 North Second Street
5th Floor
Harrisburg, PA 17101
Phone: 717-238-9300
Fax: 717-238-9325
Directions to Harrisburg Office
email us

651 Holiday Drive
Foster Plaza 5, Suite 300
Pittsburgh, PA 15220
Phone: 412-250-2632
Fax: 412-250-4804
Directions to Pittsburgh Office
email us